ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT

//ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT

ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT

ATTORNEY FEE SHIFTING IN PATENT SUITS IN U.S. DISTRICT COURTS: AUGUST REPORT

On July 30, Judge MCCAFFERTY in the District of New Hampshire denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. East Coast Sheet Metal Fabricating Corp. v. Autodesk, Inc.

On July 30, Judge YEAKEL in the Western District of Texas denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Ushijima v. Samsung Electronics Co.

On August 3, Judge BROWNING in the District of New Mexico denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. General Protecht Group, Inc. v. Leviton Manufacturing Co.

On August 4, Magistrate Judge SPAULDING in the Middle District of Florida denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Sweepstakes Patent Company, LLC v. Burns

On August 10, Judge BENITEZ in the Southern District of California denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Pacing Technologies, LLC v. Garmin International, Inc.

On August 11, Judge GILSTRAP in the Eastern District of Texas denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc.

On August 12, Judge OLGUIN in the Central District of California granted $37,000 in attorney fees to the accused infringer. Yufa v. TSI Inc.

On August 17, Federal Circuit Judge BRYSON sitting in the Eastern District of Texas denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Trover Group, Inc. v. Dedicated Micros USA

On August 18, Judge REAL in the Central District of California granted $733,414.34 in attorney fees to the accused infringer. Large Audience Display Systems, LLC v. Tennman Productions, LLC

On August 18, Judge TUCKER in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania granted $6.5 million in attorney fees to the accused infringers. Checkpoint Systems, Inc. v. All-Tag Security S.A.

On August 19, Judge SEEBORG of the Northern District of California denied accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. Vasudevan Software, Inc. v. Microstrategy, Inc.

On August 19, Judge BENCIVENGO of the Southern District of California granted $359,733.17 in attorney fees to the accused infringer. Deep Sky Software, Inc. v. Southwest Airlines Co.

On August 20, Judge SLEET in the District of Delaware granted the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees. In re: Rembrandt Technologies

On August 21, Judge STEARNS in the District of Massachusetts denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees.Cephalon, Inc. v. Celgene Corp.

On August 21, Magistrate Judge NOEL in the District of Minnesota recommended denying the patent owner’s motion for attorney fees. Rudolph Technologies, Inc. v. Camtek Ltd.

On August 24, Judge JACKSON in the Eastern District of Virginia denied the accused infringer’s motion for attorney fees.Dietgoal Innovations, LLC v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.